Skip to main content

The Hon’ble Division Bench of the Delhi High Court on 11th April 2019 allowed an appeal filed by well-known shoe maker Christian Louboutin, renowned for its famous RED SOLE shoes. The appeal challenged a judgment passed by a single judge of the court in a suit filed by the brand owner enforcing its RED SOLE trademark, which was dismissed at the threshold.

The Hon’ble Division Bench of the Delhi High Court while setting aside the judgment found that the Single Judge’s invocation of a provision under the code of Civil Procedure dealing with ‘judgement on Admissions’, to dismiss the lawsuit at the first date of hearing was erroneous.

The Hon’ble Division Bench further observed that the impugned Judgment passed was contrary to the other orders passed in favour of Christian Louboutin by coordinate Single Benches of the Delhi High Court, in particular the judgment passed recognizing the RED SOLE trademark as a well-known trademark. The Hon’ble Bench stated that it was well established that in cases where there exists a difference of opinion on questions of law by coordinate benches, the matter should be reffered to a larger bench.

The Division Bench observed that on a holistic reading of the plaint, there were sufficient facts pleaded by the plaintiff which justified issuance of notice to the Defendants and a proper hearing thereafter. The Hon’ble Bench, while setting aside the judgment, remanded the matter to a Single Judge to decide the plaintiff’s Injunction Application. The matter is now listed on the 13th of May, 2019 for both parties to appear before the learned Single Judge in Christian Louboutin’s restored issue.

Team: Pravin Anand, Dhruv Anand, Udita M Patro and Nischay Mall

Most Recent

News & Insights

VIEW ALL
News & Updates
Nov 04, 2025

In a remarkable conclusion to one of India’s longest-running trademark disputes, the order authored by Justice Sanjeev Narula of the Hon’ble High Court

DELHI HIGH COURT BRINGS 25-YEAR “CELEBRATIONS” TRADEMARK DISPUTE TO A WHOLESOME CLOSE
News & Updates
Nov 02, 2025

Partner Litigation, Dhruv Anand, spoke to Times of India for its dive-deep article on ‘Stars v AI’ giving a 360 degree roundup of what actually makes

Stars vs AI: Dhruv Anand speaks to ToI about personality rights and the intent behind protecting them
Thought Leadership
Oct 22, 2025

‘First published on Lexology’ By: Pravin Anand, Vaishali R Mittal and Siddhant Chamola A. INTRODUCTION Standards‑essential patents (“SEPs”)

Interim Licences vs Anti Interim Injunctions: a Cross Border Stand Off
Thought Leadership
Oct 16, 2025

‘First published on Lexology’ By: Safir Anand and Omesh Puri The Office of the Controller General of Patents, Designs, and Trade Marks has issued a

Indian Trade Marks Office issues Office Order – Streamlining Registry Function