Skip to main content

The Hon’ble Division Bench of the Delhi High Court on 11th April 2019 allowed an appeal filed by well-known shoe maker Christian Louboutin, renowned for its famous RED SOLE shoes. The appeal challenged a judgment passed by a single judge of the court in a suit filed by the brand owner enforcing its RED SOLE trademark, which was dismissed at the threshold.

The Hon’ble Division Bench of the Delhi High Court while setting aside the judgment found that the Single Judge’s invocation of a provision under the code of Civil Procedure dealing with ‘judgement on Admissions’, to dismiss the lawsuit at the first date of hearing was erroneous.

The Hon’ble Division Bench further observed that the impugned Judgment passed was contrary to the other orders passed in favour of Christian Louboutin by coordinate Single Benches of the Delhi High Court, in particular the judgment passed recognizing the RED SOLE trademark as a well-known trademark. The Hon’ble Bench stated that it was well established that in cases where there exists a difference of opinion on questions of law by coordinate benches, the matter should be reffered to a larger bench.

The Division Bench observed that on a holistic reading of the plaint, there were sufficient facts pleaded by the plaintiff which justified issuance of notice to the Defendants and a proper hearing thereafter. The Hon’ble Bench, while setting aside the judgment, remanded the matter to a Single Judge to decide the plaintiff’s Injunction Application. The matter is now listed on the 13th of May, 2019 for both parties to appear before the learned Single Judge in Christian Louboutin’s restored issue.

Team: Pravin Anand, Dhruv Anand, Udita M Patro and Nischay Mall

Most Recent

News & Insights

VIEW ALL
Thought Leadership
Dec 19, 2025

First published on Express Computer. Authored by Subroto Kumar Panda The notification of the Digital Personal Data Protection (DPDP) Rules, 2025, marks

The DPDP: An 18-month compliance imperative for the C-suite
News & Updates, Thought Leadership
Dec 16, 2025

‘First published on India Business Law Journal’ By: Pravin Anand and Dr. Ajai Garg Artificial Intelligence (AI) is fuelling one of the most significant

Law can keep us safe from superintelligence
News & Updates
Dec 05, 2025

The High Court of Delhi in a significant interim ruling, “AB SKF vs M/S PARAMOUNT BEARING CO. & ORS.”, CS(COMM) 963/2025, dated 19/11/2025 has clarified

Distinction Between Order 38, Rule 5 and Order 39, Rules 1-2 CPC in the Context of “Maintenance of Status Quo”
News & Updates
Nov 26, 2025

Authored by Pravin Anand There are areas of intellectual property law where one can sense, quite literally, the convergence of disciplines that do not

When Art Meets Science in Trademark Law: Reflections on India’s First Smell Mark