Skip to main content

Ahuja Radios, one of the largest makers of audio equipment in India, approached the Delhi High Court after learning of traders in Indore dealing in counterfeit audio equipment bearing its trademarks.

While it was aware of the infringing activity of a few traders, a broader search in the vicinity was necessary to effectively curtail the trade in counterfeit goods.

A John Doe order, a ‘class action’, was sought. This would allow impleadment of other traders in the suit if they were found to be dealing in the counterfeit goods.

The court accepted that a prima facie case had been made out, and restrained the sole identified defendant from dealing in audio equipment bearing Ahuja Radios trademarks.

In addition, the court allowed Local Commission at the “defendants’ premises…and any other premises of the defendants where such counterfeit products are stocked/sold”.

Pursuant to this order, a raid was executed at the Defendant’s premises as well as the premises of traders dealing in similar products in the vicinity. Counterfeit goods bearing the AHUJA mark were recovered from the Defendant’s premises as well as from the premises of 2 other entities in the market. These entities will now be impleaded as Defendants in the suit.

Ahuja Radios v M/S OM Sound and Decoration & Anr; before the Delhi High Court; order dated 7.12.2017

Most Recent

News & Insights

VIEW ALL
News & Updates
Nov 04, 2025

In a remarkable conclusion to one of India’s longest-running trademark disputes, the order authored by Justice Sanjeev Narula of the Hon’ble High Court

DELHI HIGH COURT BRINGS 25-YEAR “CELEBRATIONS” TRADEMARK DISPUTE TO A WHOLESOME CLOSE
News & Updates
Nov 02, 2025

Partner Litigation, Dhruv Anand, spoke to Times of India for its dive-deep article on ‘Stars v AI’ giving a 360 degree roundup of what actually makes

Stars vs AI: Dhruv Anand speaks to ToI about personality rights and the intent behind protecting them
Thought Leadership
Oct 22, 2025

‘First published on Lexology’ By: Pravin Anand, Vaishali R Mittal and Siddhant Chamola A. INTRODUCTION Standards‑essential patents (“SEPs”)

Interim Licences vs Anti Interim Injunctions: a Cross Border Stand Off
Thought Leadership
Oct 16, 2025

‘First published on Lexology’ By: Safir Anand and Omesh Puri The Office of the Controller General of Patents, Designs, and Trade Marks has issued a

Indian Trade Marks Office issues Office Order – Streamlining Registry Function