Skip to main content

Lysosomal Storage Disorders (LSDs) are rare hereditary disorders which usually afflict children, proving fatal within a few years of birth. The necessary treatment, Enzyme Replacement Therapy, is prohibitively expensive and beyond the means of even the wealthier sections of society.

The State government of Karnataka allocated funds in its 2014 budget for the treatment of rare diseases, identifying the Indira Gandhi Institute of Child Health (IGICH) as the concerned medical authority to absorb such funds and provide necessary treatment. IGICH did not commence treatment of children suffering from LSDs.

Repeated requests and campaigns by the Petitioner (a society whose members comprise children suffering from LSDs, their parents and guardians) did not result in provision of funds for the facilitation of treatment. In the wake of young children succumbing to the disease and being unable to avail the necessary treatment, the Petitioner moved Karnataka High Court at Bangalore.

On the very first day of hearing the High Court directed IGICH to provide for medical treatment, free of cost, to children suffering from LSDs. The order went unheeded, Respondents not facilitating treatment free-of-charge, citing unavailability of requisite funds.

Taking exception to the situation after contempt petitions and repeated applications were filed before it, the court has issued a blanket direction to the Respondents to ensure that treatment is provided free of cost to children suffering from LSDs. Though the Respondents cited budgetary constraints once again, the court disregarded the same, stating that monetary issues could be discussed at later stages as well.

The court’s message is clear: official authorities must be accountable for public health issues especially where a commitment has been made for facilitation of treatment.

Lysosomal Storage Disorder Society of India v. State of Karnataka

Most Recent

News & Insights

VIEW ALL
News & Updates
Nov 04, 2025

In a remarkable conclusion to one of India’s longest-running trademark disputes, the order authored by Justice Sanjeev Narula of the Hon’ble High Court

DELHI HIGH COURT BRINGS 25-YEAR “CELEBRATIONS” TRADEMARK DISPUTE TO A WHOLESOME CLOSE
News & Updates
Nov 02, 2025

Partner Litigation, Dhruv Anand, spoke to Times of India for its dive-deep article on ‘Stars v AI’ giving a 360 degree roundup of what actually makes

Stars vs AI: Dhruv Anand speaks to ToI about personality rights and the intent behind protecting them
Thought Leadership
Oct 22, 2025

‘First published on Lexology’ By: Pravin Anand, Vaishali R Mittal and Siddhant Chamola A. INTRODUCTION Standards‑essential patents (“SEPs”)

Interim Licences vs Anti Interim Injunctions: a Cross Border Stand Off
Thought Leadership
Oct 16, 2025

‘First published on Lexology’ By: Safir Anand and Omesh Puri The Office of the Controller General of Patents, Designs, and Trade Marks has issued a

Indian Trade Marks Office issues Office Order – Streamlining Registry Function