Skip to main content

Design cancellations ‘B. Braun Melsungen AG’ vs. ‘Eastern Medikit Limited’ Design cancellations of Eastern Medikit

B. Braun Melsungen AG represented by Anand and Anand filed for a cancellation petition against registered design 208450, whose proprietor is Eastern Medikit Limited. Design number 208450 relates to a ‘Safety I.V. Cannula’. 

After two exhaustive hearings on 27th October 2016 and 14th February 2017, the Controller upheld the cancellation petition and cancelled design number 208450.

The Controller held that when the impugned design is compared with the design features of the previously published designs, it is seen that the overall broad features of shape and configuration of the impugned design are the same as that of the earlier design. Not only are the features same but also said features are identically arranged in the impugned design. Thus, the impugned design is encompassing the shape and configuration of the prior design of IV cannula. The application of prior design in the respondent’s design is not original as the application of prior designs is made to the same article. Hence the respondent’s design cannot be held as new or original being in the public domain before the date of registration. In view of such findings, it is construed that the design is not new or original and not registerable.

Significance: Registered designs cancelled and helpful to B. Braun Melsungen AG in deciding the IP enforcement strategy.

Team Anand and Anand: Amita Arora

Most Recent

News & Insights

VIEW ALL
Thought Leadership
Dec 19, 2025

First published on Express Computer. Authored by Subroto Kumar Panda The notification of the Digital Personal Data Protection (DPDP) Rules, 2025, marks

The DPDP: An 18-month compliance imperative for the C-suite
News & Updates, Thought Leadership
Dec 16, 2025

‘First published on India Business Law Journal’ By: Pravin Anand and Dr. Ajai Garg Artificial Intelligence (AI) is fuelling one of the most significant

Law can keep us safe from superintelligence
News & Updates
Dec 05, 2025

The High Court of Delhi in a significant interim ruling, “AB SKF vs M/S PARAMOUNT BEARING CO. & ORS.”, CS(COMM) 963/2025, dated 19/11/2025 has clarified

Distinction Between Order 38, Rule 5 and Order 39, Rules 1-2 CPC in the Context of “Maintenance of Status Quo”
News & Updates
Nov 26, 2025

Authored by Pravin Anand There are areas of intellectual property law where one can sense, quite literally, the convergence of disciplines that do not

When Art Meets Science in Trademark Law: Reflections on India’s First Smell Mark