Skip to main content

We are pleased to share that our team comprising of Revanta Mathur and Sannat Chandna, helped Wahl Clipper Corporation overturn a refusal order issued against the registration of the trademark ‘SUPER TAPER’ under application no. 2574212 in Class 08 by the Trade Marks Registry (hereinafter referred to as the “TMR”). The TMR refused the application citing lack of distinctiveness and descriptive nature of the SUPER TAPER mark. The matter was at this stage handled by alternate counsel.

Subsequently, the client requested us to take up the matter for them and we filed an appeal before the Intellectual Property Appellate Board (hereinafter referred to as the “IPAB”) challenging the decision of the TMR.

The appeal was admitted and appointed for a final hearing. At the hearing before the Bench comprising of Justice Manmohan Singh & Dr. Onkar Nath Singh, submissions were made as follows:

Inherent distinctiveness of the mark was highlighted since the term ‘SUPER TAPER’ was only suggestive at best and thereby, qualified to be inherently distinctive in nature. Notwithstanding the aforesaid, we also emphasized on the several registrations for the mark, internationally (with the earliest one dating back to 1987 in France) along with the Affidavit of Use placed on record which incorporated substantial advertising material showcasing use of the mark for over 3 decades internationally and over 13 years in India, owing to which the trademark had acquired distinctiveness and was thereby, capable of being identified and protected as a trademark in India.

The Bench agreed with our submissions and set aside the order of the TMR, and ordered the TMR to accept the application and have it advertised in the Trade Marks Journal, as per the Trade Marks Rules, 2017.

Wahl Clipper Corporation (Wahl) has been the leader in the professional and home grooming category since the year 1919, with over 3,300 employees worldwide and a robust customer base in approximately 165 countries.

Most Recent

News & Insights

VIEW ALL
News & Updates
Dec 05, 2025

The High Court of Delhi in a significant interim ruling, “AB SKF vs M/S PARAMOUNT BEARING CO. & ORS.”, CS(COMM) 963/2025, dated 19/11/2025 has clarified

Distinction Between Order 38, Rule 5 and Order 39, Rules 1-2 CPC in the Context of “Maintenance of Status Quo”
News & Updates
Nov 26, 2025

Authored by Pravin Anand There are areas of intellectual property law where one can sense, quite literally, the convergence of disciplines that do not

When Art Meets Science in Trademark Law: Reflections on India’s First Smell Mark
Thought Leadership
Nov 25, 2025

First published on Lexology. Authored by Vaishali R Mittal In a landmark moment for Indian intellectual property law, the Trademarks Registry has accepted

Scenting the Future: How India’s First Smell Mark Application Aligns with Global Jurisprudence
Thought Leadership
Nov 21, 2025

We are proud to share that the Trade Marks Registry of India has, for the first time, accepted an olfactory (smell) mark for advertisement — “Floral

A Landmark First for Indian Trademark Law