Skip to main content

The Defendants, in this case, were portraying to unwary customers that they are a prominent TATA Group Company and are engaged in the business of providing multi-layered financial/ insurance services identical to that provided by the Plaintiff No.2 i.e. Tata Capital Financial Services Ltd. In this regard, the Defendants had also made a fraudulent website at www.tatafinserve.com. The Defendants were seeking security deposits against financial services portraying as part of the TATA Group and various persons were getting duped by asking persons to deposit security deposits in the Defendants’ bank accounts.

The Hon’ble Court passed orders freezing the bank accounts of the Defendants, granted Rs. 10 lakh as damages to the Plaintiffs in light of the Defendants’ illegal and infringing activities. Costs of the proceedings were also granted in favour of the Plaintiffs. Further, the Court has directed the domain www.tatafinserve.com to be transferred to the Plaintiffs.

Most Recent

News & Insights

VIEW ALL
Thought Leadership
Oct 22, 2025

‘First published on Lexology’ By: Pravin Anand, Vaishali R Mittal and Siddhant Chamola A. INTRODUCTION Standards‑essential patents (“SEPs”)

Interim Licences vs Anti Interim Injunctions: a Cross Border Stand Off
Thought Leadership
Oct 16, 2025

‘First published on Lexology’ By: Safir Anand and Omesh Puri The Office of the Controller General of Patents, Designs, and Trade Marks has issued a

Indian Trade Marks Office issues Office Order – Streamlining Registry Function
News & Updates
Oct 16, 2025

Being a part of the International Trademarks Association (INTA) is always a delight. Here’s how Anand and Anand would be joining forces with INTA on

Team Anand and Anand for INTA
Thought Leadership
Oct 14, 2025

‘First published on Lexology’ By: Safir Anand and Arpita Mukherjee When WeWork faced turmoil globally, leading its U.S. parent company to file for

WeWork India’s NSE Listing: A Lesson in Local Execution Within Global Brands