Skip to main content

The Delhi High Court Passes an ex parte order injuncting the Defendants from using the mark TATA in any manner

In the Tata Sons Ltd. v. Amar Singh Gupta and Ajay Gupta case, the Defendants were dealing in PVC flexible pipes bearing the mark B TATA ®. After hearing the arguments made by Anand and Anand, the Hon’ble Judge passed an ex parte order injuncting the Defendants from using the mark TATA in any manner whatsoever.

The Hon’ble Judge further appointed a Local Commissioner to visit the premises of the Defendants to seize and seal all infringing goods that may be found in their power and possession. The Local Commissioner has also been empowered to ask the Defendants to disclose the name of the manufacturer/source of the infringing goods so that such goods can also be seized and the infringement can be nipped in the bud.

Read more: https://www.anandandanand.com/?s=TATA

 

Most Recent

News & Insights

VIEW ALL
News & Updates, Thought Leadership
Aug 01, 2026

On 24 May 2024, after roughly a quarter-century of negotiation, the Member States of the World Intellectual Property Organisation adopted, by consensus

WIPO GRATK Treaty: India Helped Write and Would Not Sign
News & Updates, Thought Leadership
Jul 17, 2026

First published by Lexology. Authors: Sandhya Singh and Sampada Kapoor Modern sport is no longer merely an athletic competition; it is a multi-billion-dollar

Managing Ambush Marketing: Legal and Commercial Perspectives
News & Updates, Thought Leadership
Jul 16, 2026

First published by IP Stars. Authors: Safir Anand and Sehr Anand In a digital landscape where the internet never forgets, an individual’s past can

The Right Not to Be Published: Inside the Delhi High Court’s Landmark ‘Right to Be Forgotten’ Judgment
News & Updates, Thought Leadership
Jul 14, 2026

First published by Lexology. Authors: Lakshmidevi Somanath and Kanishka Vaish I. The Quiet Trend of Strong Evidence Engineering Anyone who has appeared

Evidence Engineering in IP Litigation