Skip to main content

The Delhi High Court Passes an ex parte order injuncting the Defendants from using the mark TATA in any manner

In the Tata Sons Ltd. v. Amar Singh Gupta and Ajay Gupta case, the Defendants were dealing in PVC flexible pipes bearing the mark B TATA ®. After hearing the arguments made by Anand and Anand, the Hon’ble Judge passed an ex parte order injuncting the Defendants from using the mark TATA in any manner whatsoever.

The Hon’ble Judge further appointed a Local Commissioner to visit the premises of the Defendants to seize and seal all infringing goods that may be found in their power and possession. The Local Commissioner has also been empowered to ask the Defendants to disclose the name of the manufacturer/source of the infringing goods so that such goods can also be seized and the infringement can be nipped in the bud.

Read more: https://www.anandandanand.com/?s=TATA

 

Most Recent

News & Insights

VIEW ALL
Thought Leadership
Oct 22, 2025

‘First published on Lexology’ By: Pravin Anand, Vaishali R Mittal and Siddhant Chamola A. INTRODUCTION Standards‑essential patents (“SEPs”)

Interim Licences vs Anti Interim Injunctions: a Cross Border Stand Off
Thought Leadership
Oct 16, 2025

‘First published on Lexology’ By: Safir Anand and Omesh Puri The Office of the Controller General of Patents, Designs, and Trade Marks has issued a

Indian Trade Marks Office issues Office Order – Streamlining Registry Function
News & Updates
Oct 16, 2025

Being a part of the International Trademarks Association (INTA) is always a delight. Here’s how Anand and Anand would be joining forces with INTA on

Team Anand and Anand for INTA
Thought Leadership
Oct 14, 2025

‘First published on Lexology’ By: Safir Anand and Arpita Mukherjee When WeWork faced turmoil globally, leading its U.S. parent company to file for

WeWork India’s NSE Listing: A Lesson in Local Execution Within Global Brands