Skip to main content

The Delhi High Court Passes an ex parte order injuncting the Defendants from using the mark TATA in any manner

In the Tata Sons Ltd. v. Amar Singh Gupta and Ajay Gupta case, the Defendants were dealing in PVC flexible pipes bearing the mark B TATA ®. After hearing the arguments made by Anand and Anand, the Hon’ble Judge passed an ex parte order injuncting the Defendants from using the mark TATA in any manner whatsoever.

The Hon’ble Judge further appointed a Local Commissioner to visit the premises of the Defendants to seize and seal all infringing goods that may be found in their power and possession. The Local Commissioner has also been empowered to ask the Defendants to disclose the name of the manufacturer/source of the infringing goods so that such goods can also be seized and the infringement can be nipped in the bud.

Read more: https://www.anandandanand.com/?s=TATA

 

Most Recent

News & Insights

VIEW ALL
News & Updates
Nov 04, 2025

In a remarkable conclusion to one of India’s longest-running trademark disputes, the order authored by Justice Sanjeev Narula of the Hon’ble High Court

DELHI HIGH COURT BRINGS 25-YEAR “CELEBRATIONS” TRADEMARK DISPUTE TO A WHOLESOME CLOSE
News & Updates
Nov 02, 2025

Partner Litigation, Dhruv Anand, spoke to Times of India for its dive-deep article on ‘Stars v AI’ giving a 360 degree roundup of what actually makes

Stars vs AI: Dhruv Anand speaks to ToI about personality rights and the intent behind protecting them
Thought Leadership
Oct 22, 2025

‘First published on Lexology’ By: Pravin Anand, Vaishali R Mittal and Siddhant Chamola A. INTRODUCTION Standards‑essential patents (“SEPs”)

Interim Licences vs Anti Interim Injunctions: a Cross Border Stand Off
Thought Leadership
Oct 16, 2025

‘First published on Lexology’ By: Safir Anand and Omesh Puri The Office of the Controller General of Patents, Designs, and Trade Marks has issued a

Indian Trade Marks Office issues Office Order – Streamlining Registry Function