Skip to main content

With the Delhi High Court stressing in the interim that use of trademarked words for bidding in the Google ad programme could amount to trademark infringement, The Economic Times approached Safir Anand for his opinion on what the judgement means.

“Indian courts have taken a different stand for the protection of ‘trademark owners’. Over the last three cases (for MakeMyTrip, UdChalo and DRS Logistics), the courts have prohibited the unauthorised users from bidding for the trademarks of other entities as that would amount to violation of the rights of the trademark owner. This puts a lot of onus on search engines to ascertain that the keyword chosen by the advertiser is not trademarked and, even if it is, the same has been licensed or assigned or subjected to consented use,” Safir tells ET.

“Certainly, the view adopted by Indian courts puts a greater burden on the search engines and therefore has more impact on their ad business as compared to Europe. However, the stand will become clearer as the judicial approach on the topic matures and becomes clearer,” he adds.

The evolving judicial stance on Google Ads trademark infringement in India marks a significant shift in how digital advertising practices are viewed through the lens of trademark law. Unlike jurisdictions where keyword bidding on competitors’ trademarks is often permitted subject to disclosure and use-based tests, Indian courts appear to be adopting a more rights-holder–centric approach. This signals a move towards stricter accountability, not only for advertisers who seek to capitalise on the goodwill of established brands, but also for intermediary platforms that facilitate such advertising.

For brand owners, these rulings provide a stronger enforcement mechanism against unauthorised keyword bidding that diverts consumer traffic and creates initial interest confusion. For advertisers, however, the decisions necessitate enhanced due diligence before selecting keywords, particularly in competitive markets. Search engines, on their part, may be compelled to revisit internal compliance frameworks, licensing checks and consent mechanisms. As jurisprudence develops further, clarity on the balance between fair competition and trademark protection will be crucial for sustaining digital advertising ecosystems in India.

Read the article here: https://lnkd.in/dUGxZU7R

Most Recent

News & Insights

VIEW ALL
News & Updates, Thought Leadership
Sep 02, 2026

Author: Lakshmidevi Somanath The law currently provides creators exclusive rights over their creation for a limited time, which gives a human inventor

From Innovation Incentives to Technology Diffusion – Protection of Intellectual Property Created by Agentic Artificial Intelligence
News & Updates, Thought Leadership
Aug 30, 2026

I. The Infringer’s Privacy Paradox The Digital Personal Data Protection Act, 2023 (“DPDP Act”) is built around a clear rule. Personal data

The DPDP Act’s Unanswered Question: Can Privacy Law Block a Software Piracy Investigation?
News & Updates, Thought Leadership
Aug 28, 2026

‘First published on India Business Law Journal’ By: Pravin Anand, Ajai Garg and Siddhant Chamola The Supreme Court of India’s Artificial Intelligence

Keeping the ‘judge’ in judgment
News & Updates, Thought Leadership
Aug 05, 2026

‘First published on Asia IP’ By: Safir Anand and Ritu Bhargava India has taken important steps forward in protecting consumers who use its digital

Misleading ads and dark patterns: Evolving jurisprudence in India