Skip to main content

With the Delhi High Court stressing in the interim that use of trademarked words for bidding in the Google ad programme could amount to trademark infringement, The Economic Times approached Safir Anand for his opinion on what the judgement means.

“Indian courts have taken a different stand for the protection of ‘trademark owners’. Over the last three cases (for MakeMyTrip, UdChalo and DRS Logistics), the courts have prohibited the unauthorised users from bidding for the trademarks of other entities as that would amount to violation of the rights of the trademark owner. This puts a lot of onus on search engines to ascertain that the keyword chosen by the advertiser is not trademarked and, even if it is, the same has been licensed or assigned or subjected to consented use,” Safir tells ET.

“Certainly, the view adopted by Indian courts puts a greater burden on the search engines and therefore has more impact on their ad business as compared to Europe. However, the stand will become clearer as the judicial approach on the topic matures and becomes clearer,” he adds.

The evolving judicial stance on Google Ads trademark infringement in India marks a significant shift in how digital advertising practices are viewed through the lens of trademark law. Unlike jurisdictions where keyword bidding on competitors’ trademarks is often permitted subject to disclosure and use-based tests, Indian courts appear to be adopting a more rights-holder–centric approach. This signals a move towards stricter accountability, not only for advertisers who seek to capitalise on the goodwill of established brands, but also for intermediary platforms that facilitate such advertising.

For brand owners, these rulings provide a stronger enforcement mechanism against unauthorised keyword bidding that diverts consumer traffic and creates initial interest confusion. For advertisers, however, the decisions necessitate enhanced due diligence before selecting keywords, particularly in competitive markets. Search engines, on their part, may be compelled to revisit internal compliance frameworks, licensing checks and consent mechanisms. As jurisprudence develops further, clarity on the balance between fair competition and trademark protection will be crucial for sustaining digital advertising ecosystems in India.

Read the article here: https://lnkd.in/dUGxZU7R

Most Recent

News & Insights

VIEW ALL
News & Updates
Jan 02, 2026

First published by Lexology. Authors: Pravin Anand, Saif Khan, Shobhit Agarwal and Prajjwal Kushwaha A. Background B. Legal Issues Addressed C. Directions

LANDMARK RULING ON DOMAIN NAME FRAUD AND SYSTEMIC REFORMS IN DIGITAL COMMERCE
Thought Leadership
Jan 01, 2026

First published on Enterprise IT World. Authored by Subroto Kumar Panda As we stand on the final day of 2025, reflecting on a year of dizzying

The Great Dissolve: Re-Engineering Enterprise Workflows for the 2026 AI Paradigm
Thought Leadership
Dec 19, 2025

First published on Express Computer. Authored by Subroto Kumar Panda The notification of the Digital Personal Data Protection (DPDP) Rules, 2025, marks

The DPDP: An 18-month compliance imperative for the C-suite
News & Updates, Thought Leadership
Dec 16, 2025

‘First published on India Business Law Journal’ By: Pravin Anand and Dr. Ajai Garg Artificial Intelligence (AI) is fuelling one of the most significant

Law can keep us safe from superintelligence