Skip to main content

Yahoo! Inc certainly had reason to yodel after obtaining permanent injunction against Defendants infringing the YAHOO trade mark. What’s more, the court assessed in excess of Rs. 38 lakh towards damages and legal cost in favour of Yahoo, making it possibly one of the highest sums awarded in a trade mark infringement matter.

Yahoo, known best for its vast internet-centric businesses, was appreciated by the court to be “one of the most recognized brands in the world”, and that YAHOO is listed as a “Well Known Mark” with Controller General of Patents Design & Trade Marks.

What is perhaps less known is that the mark and trade name are not confined to computer and internet related services, but extend to a wide variety products such as apparel and office supplies. The famous mark is also registered under Classes 29 and 30 in the trade mark register, covering a wide variety of foods, beverages and products used in the preparation thereof.

The court determined Defendants’ use of the YAHOO mark in relation to their snack foods to be “piggybacking” on Yahoo’s reputation and the tactic was indubitably dishonest.

The court had earlier granted an ex parte order restraining the Defendants from manufacturing, selling and propagating in any manner snack foods using the YAHOO mark.

Yahoo! Inc v Sanjay Patel & Ors.

Most Recent

News & Insights

VIEW ALL
News & Updates, Thought Leadership
Jun 16, 2026

First published by Lexology. Authors: Pravin Anand and Dr. Neeti Wilson Introduction India’s biodiversity is one of its greatest strategic assets.

India’s Biodiversity Framework at a Crossroads: Industry Perspectives on the Biological Diversity Act and ABS Regulations, 2025
News & Updates, Thought Leadership
Jun 16, 2026

First published by Lexology. Authors: Sandhya Singh and Sampada Kapoor Introduction In today’s marketplace, consumers often identify products not

Protecting Colour as a Brand Asset: Lessons from the Exide-Amara Raja Decision
News & Updates, Thought Leadership
Jun 11, 2026

‘First published on Legal500’ By: Lakshmidevi Somanath The Supreme Court of India’s 2025 decision in K. Mangayarkarasi and Anr v. N. J. Sundaresan marks

Arbitrating Trademark Disputes Following Mangayarkarasi – The Extent of Contractual Reach into Public Law
Thought Leadership
May 30, 2026

‘First published on Enterprise IT World’ Author: Subroto Kumar Panda The defining question for every board of directors has changed. It is no longer,

From Blueprint to Battle-Ready: The CIO’s Executive Guide to Cyber Resilience