Skip to main content

A look at comparative and parody advertisements in India and an analysis of the uncharted common law for comparative advertisements.

Comparative Advertisements consist of various sub species, some of which generally steal the legal limelight are puffery, disparaging advertisements and parody advertisements. High courts have been accepting of puffery even if it is untrue, however defamation does entitle the defamed to damages and an injunction against the defamer. Also crucial is the medium used to convey the comparative advertisement, for impact varies with different mediums of communication.

Authored by Vaishali Mittal.

This article was published in Legal Era January 2013.

Read more

Most Recent

News & Insights

VIEW ALL
Thought Leadership
Oct 22, 2025

‘First published on Lexology’ By: Pravin Anand, Vaishali R Mittal and Siddhant Chamola A. INTRODUCTION Standards‑essential patents (“SEPs”)

Interim Licences vs Anti Interim Injunctions: a Cross Border Stand Off
Thought Leadership
Oct 16, 2025

‘First published on Lexology’ By: Safir Anand and Omesh Puri The Office of the Controller General of Patents, Designs, and Trade Marks has issued a

Indian Trade Marks Office issues Office Order – Streamlining Registry Function
News & Updates
Oct 16, 2025

Being a part of the International Trademarks Association (INTA) is always a delight. Here’s how Anand and Anand would be joining forces with INTA on

Team Anand and Anand for INTA
Thought Leadership
Oct 14, 2025

‘First published on Lexology’ By: Safir Anand and Arpita Mukherjee When WeWork faced turmoil globally, leading its U.S. parent company to file for

WeWork India’s NSE Listing: A Lesson in Local Execution Within Global Brands