Skip to main content

In proceedings initiated by US pharmaceutical major Pfizer Inc. for infringement of its patent against a Hyderabad based generic drug manufacturer, the Delhi High Court has restrained the defendants from making, selling, distributing, advertising and exporting drugs infringing the suit patent.

The suit was instituted by the plaintiffs in September 2015, after discovering that the defendants were ready to market the generic version of SUTENT, their patented cancer treatment drug. The defendants nevertheless continued to advertise the infringing products on their website in contempt of the court’s order and delayed filing a written statement. Their actions earned the court’s reproach, which, on 16 August 2016, while decreeing the suit in favour of the plaintiffs, directed the defendants to pay costs of Rs.2 million to a cancer research organization in Chennai.

Sugen v KV Prakash

Most Recent

News & Insights

VIEW ALL
News & Updates, Thought Leadership
Mar 10, 2026

‘First published on BW Legal World’ By: Safir Anand, Mudit Kaushik and Sehr Anand India has strong design talent, ranging from local craftspeople to

Not Just Made in India – Designed in India The Budget’s Most Strategic Move
News & Updates, Thought Leadership
Mar 10, 2026

‘First published on BW Legal World’ By: Pravin Anand and Dr. Ajai Garg The Summit underscored a broader reality: artificial intelligence is no longer

India AI Impact Summit 2026: Law, Leadership, and India’s AI Moment
Thought Leadership
Feb 13, 2026

‘First published on Enterprise IT World’ By: Subroto Kumar Panda How the 2026 IT Rule Amendments Protect You in the Age of AI In an era where seeing

The Digital Armor – 2026
Thought Leadership
Feb 11, 2026

Authors: Safir Anand, Mudit Kaushik and Sehr Anand The establishment of a new National Institute of Design (NID-East) in India’s eastern region,

Can New NID-East Ignite India’s Design Revolution?