Skip to main content

DELHI HIGH COURT BRINGS 25-YEAR “CELEBRATIONS” TRADEMARK DISPUTE TO A WHOLESOME CLOSE

In a remarkable conclusion to one of India’s longest-running trademark disputes, the order authored by Justice Sanjeev Narula of the Hon’ble High Court of Delhi, earlier this month, brought final closure to the 25-year litigation between two titans of the confectionery world – Mars and Cadbury (now Mondelez) over the mark “CELEBRATIONS.” [CS(COMM) 409/2018]

The matter, which had extended beyond the courtroom, with both parties expanded roots in the Indian Trade Marks Registry through multiple cross oppositions and rectifications, were also resolved before the Hon’ble Court, which was submitted to be the full and final mutual settlement between the parties. The Hon’ble Court decreed the suit while recording these terms as a definitive and conclusive resolution to the long-standing controversy.

What makes this resolution particularly meaningful is not only the conclusion of a prolonged rivalry over the standout reputation held by the parties but also the goodwill gesture that followed. In a symbolic act reflecting upon the contested word ‘CELEBRATIONS’, both companies voluntarily undertook to distribute assortments of their confectionery products or nutritionally balanced alternatives with an aggregate worth of INR 5 lakhs each  to schools across Delhi, under the supervision of the Directorate of Education and the Delhi State Legal Services Authority. The Hon’ble Court expressly commended this act of cooperation and public spirit, observing that “true celebration lies not in triumph over another, but in generosity towards others.”

The order is also noteworthy for its clarity and tone, blending judicial precision with humane perspective by recognizing that even the fiercest commercial contests can conclude in harmony when goodwill prevails.

The parties’ respective global in-house IP teams played a pivotal role in achieving this resolution by proactively initiating settlement talks and negotiating the essential terms directly with each other.

Commenting on the outcome, Bence Bozóki, Senior IP Counsel, Mars Inc., remarked:

“This order is by far the most wholesome legal document I have ever read in my life. It is a beautiful conclusion of an important legal battle.”

Such orders are a reminder that even the most hard-fought rivalries can find resolution when guided by the maturity of brand owners. It also goes on to show how Indian IP jurisprudence is evolving into a culture of responsible enforcement.

Advocates Pravin Anand, and Vaishali Mittal represented Mars Inc. and were ably assisted by Siddhant Chamola and Shivang Sharma.

Advocate Nancy Roy appeared for Cadbury.

Most Recent

News & Insights

VIEW ALL
Thought Leadership
Dec 19, 2025

First published on Express Computer. Authored by Subroto Kumar Panda The notification of the Digital Personal Data Protection (DPDP) Rules, 2025, marks

The DPDP: An 18-month compliance imperative for the C-suite
News & Updates
Dec 05, 2025

The High Court of Delhi in a significant interim ruling, “AB SKF vs M/S PARAMOUNT BEARING CO. & ORS.”, CS(COMM) 963/2025, dated 19/11/2025 has clarified

Distinction Between Order 38, Rule 5 and Order 39, Rules 1-2 CPC in the Context of “Maintenance of Status Quo”
News & Updates
Nov 26, 2025

Authored by Pravin Anand There are areas of intellectual property law where one can sense, quite literally, the convergence of disciplines that do not

When Art Meets Science in Trademark Law: Reflections on India’s First Smell Mark
Thought Leadership
Nov 25, 2025

First published on Lexology. Authored by Vaishali R Mittal In a landmark moment for Indian intellectual property law, the Trademarks Registry has accepted

Scenting the Future: How India’s First Smell Mark Application Aligns with Global Jurisprudence