Skip to main content

Delhi High Court grants interim injunction in favour of Vishesh Films, restrains T-Series from using ‘Aashiqui’ title

Vishesh Films Pvt. Ltd. v. Super Cassettes Industries Ltd

Represented by team Anand and Anand, filmmaker Mukesh Bhatt’s production company Vishesh Films Pvt. Ltd obtained a major relief as the Delhi High Court on September 2 granted an interim injunction in its favour, restraining Super Cassettes Industries Ltd (T-Series) from using the titles “Tu Hi Aashiqui”, “Tu Hi Aashiqui Hai” or any other name which uses the mark “Aashiqui” for their film.

This judgment is particularly relevant in view of the following findings:

  • Film titles justify protection under trademark law. The significance of film titles in the present context of a series is particularly pronounced because they serve as a bridge between the various instalments, ensuring continuity and maintaining a connection with the audience.
  • To argue that “Aashiqui” is descriptive would imply that it describes the film’s plot, characters, etc., however, films are more than the sum of their parts, being intricate stories where no single word can serve as a comprehensive descriptor. Therefore, “Aashiqui” is prima facie not a mere descriptive term but rather a distinctive mark that suggests a specific brand of romantic films, capable of being protected under trademark law.
  • Notwithstanding the registration being classified as a device mark, it must follow that protection has been granted to the term “Aashiqui”, regardless of the font, design, or stylistic presentation in which it is used. The reference to word marks as device marks for registration purposes does not diminish the protection afforded to the word “Aashiqui”, which is the core element of the brand identity of the Aashiqui Franchise.
  • The word “Aashiqui”, when used in the title of a film, is immediately recognizable to the public as being associated with the highly successful romantic film series. This association is not merely incidental; it has been built through years of significant commercial success. Moreover, the addition of the words “Tu Hi” and “Hai” does not significantly alter the overall impression of the title, particularly when viewed through the lens of imperfect recollection.
  • This case is particularly concerned with the initial likelihood of confusion, whereby the public might be misled into believing that there is an association between the Defendant’s film and the well-established Aashiqui Franchise. This confusion, even if temporary, can cause significant harm by diluting the “Aashiqui” brand.

Team: Pravin Anand, Dhruv Anand, Udita Patro, Sampurna Sanyal, Nimrat Singh and Dhananjay Khanna

Most Recent

News & Insights

VIEW ALL
News & Updates, Thought Leadership
Sep 02, 2026

Author: Lakshmidevi Somanath The law currently provides creators exclusive rights over their creation for a limited time, which gives a human inventor

From Innovation Incentives to Technology Diffusion – Protection of Intellectual Property Created by Agentic Artificial Intelligence
News & Updates, Thought Leadership
Aug 30, 2026

I. The Infringer’s Privacy Paradox The Digital Personal Data Protection Act, 2023 (“DPDP Act”) is built around a clear rule. Personal data

The DPDP Act’s Unanswered Question: Can Privacy Law Block a Software Piracy Investigation?
News & Updates, Thought Leadership
Aug 28, 2026

‘First published on India Business Law Journal’ By: Pravin Anand, Ajai Garg and Siddhant Chamola The Supreme Court of India’s Artificial Intelligence

Keeping the ‘judge’ in judgment
News & Updates, Thought Leadership
Aug 05, 2026

‘First published on Asia IP’ By: Safir Anand and Ritu Bhargava India has taken important steps forward in protecting consumers who use its digital

Misleading ads and dark patterns: Evolving jurisprudence in India