Skip to main content

With ever-increasing premiums for domain names differences between Indian and international dispute resolution policies are cause for concern, explain Pravin Anand and Raunaq Kamath.

The value of online real estate has increased dramatically. Cyber-squatters all over the world are registering domain names in bulk, a presumably easy way to ensure a quick profit. Rights holders are, therefore, increasingly resorting to dispute resolution mechanisms to recover domain names.

While the .IN Dispute Resolution Policy, overseen by the National Internet Exchange of India, and the Uniform Domain-Name Dispute-Resolution Policy follow similar procedure, the INDRP remains unique. Its distinctness lies in the three criteria which a complainant must satisfy under the three respective policies.

This article was published in Trademarks, Brands and the Internet 2013.

To continue reading, please contact us at email@anandandanand.com

Most Recent

News & Insights

VIEW ALL
News & Updates, Thought Leadership
Jan 30, 2026

First published by Lexology. Authors: Safir Anand and Omesh Puri In today’s innovation‑driven economy, design rights have become a core element of

Proposed Reforms to India’s Design Protection Framework
News & Updates, Thought Leadership
Jan 17, 2026

‘First published on Asia IP’ By: Pravin Anand, Madhu Rewari and Ansh Maggo With the increasing commercialization of intellectual property in India,

Arbitrability of Intellectual Property Disputes in India
News & Updates, Thought Leadership
Jan 15, 2026

First published by Lexology. Authors: Safir Anand, Mudit Kaushik and Sehr Anand The handling of price sensitive corporate information has become increasingly

The Regulatory Cost of Informal Digital Disclosures
News & Updates
Jan 02, 2026

First published by Lexology. Authors: Pravin Anand, Saif Khan, Shobhit Agarwal and Prajjwal Kushwaha A. Background B. Legal Issues Addressed C. Directions

Landmark Ruling On Domain Name Fraud and Systematic Reforms in Digital Commerce