Skip to main content

In the Dharampal Satyapal v. Mr. Rajeev Kumar & Anr. case, the Dharampal Satyapal Group filed a lawsuit claiming the statutory rights vested in its trademark, copyright and other allied rights in the well-known mark CATCH,  and its associated labels amongst other reliefs against this entity using the mark CATCH or labels catch /  for dealing with “Digital Satellite Receivers”. Owing to the insurmountable reputation of the Plaintiff’s CATCH trademarks in the food & beverage industry itself, Justice Manmohan granted an injunction against this entity using an identical mark in relation to different goods under the ambit of Section 29(4) of the Trademarks Act, 1999. Additionally, the Single Judge also acknowledged the prima facie well-known character of the Plaintiff’s CATCH trademarks!

Most Recent

News & Insights

VIEW ALL
News & Updates, Thought Leadership
Jun 16, 2026

First published by Lexology. Authors: Pravin Anand and Dr. Neeti Wilson Introduction India’s biodiversity is one of its greatest strategic assets.

India’s Biodiversity Framework at a Crossroads: Industry Perspectives on the Biological Diversity Act and ABS Regulations, 2025
News & Updates, Thought Leadership
Jun 16, 2026

First published by Lexology. Authors: Sandhya Singh and Sampada Kapoor Introduction In today’s marketplace, consumers often identify products not

Protecting Colour as a Brand Asset: Lessons from the Exide-Amara Raja Decision
News & Updates, Thought Leadership
Jun 11, 2026

‘First published on Legal500’ By: Lakshmidevi Somanath The Supreme Court of India’s 2025 decision in K. Mangayarkarasi and Anr v. N. J. Sundaresan marks

Arbitrating Trademark Disputes Following Mangayarkarasi – The Extent of Contractual Reach into Public Law
Thought Leadership
May 30, 2026

‘First published on Enterprise IT World’ Author: Subroto Kumar Panda The defining question for every board of directors has changed. It is no longer,

From Blueprint to Battle-Ready: The CIO’s Executive Guide to Cyber Resilience