Skip to main content

Ahuja Radios, one of the largest makers of audio equipment in India, approached the Delhi High Court after learning of traders in Indore dealing in counterfeit audio equipment bearing its trademarks.

While it was aware of the infringing activity of a few traders, a broader search in the vicinity was necessary to effectively curtail the trade in counterfeit goods.

A John Doe order, a ‘class action’, was sought. This would allow impleadment of other traders in the suit if they were found to be dealing in the counterfeit goods.

The court accepted that a prima facie case had been made out, and restrained the sole identified defendant from dealing in audio equipment bearing Ahuja Radios trademarks.

In addition, the court allowed Local Commission at the “defendants’ premises…and any other premises of the defendants where such counterfeit products are stocked/sold”.

Pursuant to this order, a raid was executed at the Defendant’s premises as well as the premises of traders dealing in similar products in the vicinity. Counterfeit goods bearing the AHUJA mark were recovered from the Defendant’s premises as well as from the premises of 2 other entities in the market. These entities will now be impleaded as Defendants in the suit.

Ahuja Radios v M/S OM Sound and Decoration & Anr; before the Delhi High Court; order dated 7.12.2017

Most Recent

News & Insights

VIEW ALL
News & Updates, Thought Leadership
Aug 01, 2026

On 24 May 2024, after roughly a quarter-century of negotiation, the Member States of the World Intellectual Property Organisation adopted, by consensus

WIPO GRATK Treaty: India Helped Write and Would Not Sign
News & Updates, Thought Leadership
Jul 17, 2026

First published by Lexology. Authors: Sandhya Singh and Sampada Kapoor Modern sport is no longer merely an athletic competition; it is a multi-billion-dollar

Managing Ambush Marketing: Legal and Commercial Perspectives
News & Updates, Thought Leadership
Jul 16, 2026

First published by IP Stars. Authors: Safir Anand and Sehr Anand In a digital landscape where the internet never forgets, an individual’s past can

The Right Not to Be Published: Inside the Delhi High Court’s Landmark ‘Right to Be Forgotten’ Judgment
News & Updates, Thought Leadership
Jul 14, 2026

First published by Lexology. Authors: Lakshmidevi Somanath and Kanishka Vaish I. The Quiet Trend of Strong Evidence Engineering Anyone who has appeared

Evidence Engineering in IP Litigation