Skip to main content

Ahuja Radios, one of the largest makers of audio equipment in India, approached the Delhi High Court after learning of traders in Indore dealing in counterfeit audio equipment bearing its trademarks.

While it was aware of the infringing activity of a few traders, a broader search in the vicinity was necessary to effectively curtail the trade in counterfeit goods.

A John Doe order, a ‘class action’, was sought. This would allow impleadment of other traders in the suit if they were found to be dealing in the counterfeit goods.

The court accepted that a prima facie case had been made out, and restrained the sole identified defendant from dealing in audio equipment bearing Ahuja Radios trademarks.

In addition, the court allowed Local Commission at the “defendants’ premises…and any other premises of the defendants where such counterfeit products are stocked/sold”.

Pursuant to this order, a raid was executed at the Defendant’s premises as well as the premises of traders dealing in similar products in the vicinity. Counterfeit goods bearing the AHUJA mark were recovered from the Defendant’s premises as well as from the premises of 2 other entities in the market. These entities will now be impleaded as Defendants in the suit.

Ahuja Radios v M/S OM Sound and Decoration & Anr; before the Delhi High Court; order dated 7.12.2017

Most Recent

News & Insights

VIEW ALL
News & Updates, Thought Leadership
Jun 16, 2026

First published by Lexology. Authors: Pravin Anand and Dr. Neeti Wilson Introduction India’s biodiversity is one of its greatest strategic assets.

India’s Biodiversity Framework at a Crossroads: Industry Perspectives on the Biological Diversity Act and ABS Regulations, 2025
News & Updates, Thought Leadership
Jun 16, 2026

First published by Lexology. Authors: Sandhya Singh and Sampada Kapoor Introduction In today’s marketplace, consumers often identify products not

Protecting Colour as a Brand Asset: Lessons from the Exide-Amara Raja Decision
News & Updates, Thought Leadership
Jun 11, 2026

‘First published on Legal500’ By: Lakshmidevi Somanath The Supreme Court of India’s 2025 decision in K. Mangayarkarasi and Anr v. N. J. Sundaresan marks

Arbitrating Trademark Disputes Following Mangayarkarasi – The Extent of Contractual Reach into Public Law
Thought Leadership
May 30, 2026

‘First published on Enterprise IT World’ Author: Subroto Kumar Panda The defining question for every board of directors has changed. It is no longer,

From Blueprint to Battle-Ready: The CIO’s Executive Guide to Cyber Resilience