Skip to main content

Indian Patent application number 8498/DELNP/2009 of Mars Incorporated directed to ‘A milled cocoa extract comprising cocoa polyphenols, with reduced bitterness and astringency’ was objected under Section 3(c) and obviousness rejections.

The patent office held that Claim 1 is obvious and to be mere discovery thereby falling within the scope of section 3 (c) of the Patents Act, 1970, as the claims were related to cocoa extract comprising of naturally existing components that is cocoa polyphenols. Anand and Anand argued that invention demonstrated that the claimed milled cocoa extracts exhibit a reduced bitterness by at least 5 times the amount that is considered to be statistically significant. Further, it was demonstrated that the presently claimed milled cocoa extracts exhibit reduced astringency by nearly 7.5 times the amount that is considered to be statistically significant. Such results clearly demonstrate “that the claimed ranges or proportions impart more than a difference in degree to make the claimed subject matter as a whole separately patentable over the prior art and also not within the scope of section 3(c). This is important because regular cocoa extracts are notoriously bitter and thus unpalatable.

Significance: Claims directed to extracts of naturally occurring plant can be considered not falling with the scope of section 3(c) non patent eligible subject matter.

Team Anand and Anand: Amita Arora.

 

Most Recent

News & Insights

VIEW ALL
News & Updates
Nov 04, 2025

In a remarkable conclusion to one of India’s longest-running trademark disputes, the order authored by Justice Sanjeev Narula of the Hon’ble High Court

DELHI HIGH COURT BRINGS 25-YEAR “CELEBRATIONS” TRADEMARK DISPUTE TO A WHOLESOME CLOSE
News & Updates
Nov 02, 2025

Partner Litigation, Dhruv Anand, spoke to Times of India for its dive-deep article on ‘Stars v AI’ giving a 360 degree roundup of what actually makes

Stars vs AI: Dhruv Anand speaks to ToI about personality rights and the intent behind protecting them
Thought Leadership
Oct 22, 2025

‘First published on Lexology’ By: Pravin Anand, Vaishali R Mittal and Siddhant Chamola A. INTRODUCTION Standards‑essential patents (“SEPs”)

Interim Licences vs Anti Interim Injunctions: a Cross Border Stand Off
Thought Leadership
Oct 16, 2025

‘First published on Lexology’ By: Safir Anand and Omesh Puri The Office of the Controller General of Patents, Designs, and Trade Marks has issued a

Indian Trade Marks Office issues Office Order – Streamlining Registry Function