Skip to main content

The Patents (Amendment) Rules 2016, effective 16th May 2016, prescribe some major procedural changes in patent prosecution in India. The article looks at some salient changes proposed by the Rules:

  1. Address for service made mandatory
  2. Leaving and serving documents
  3. Refund of fees
  4. Inclusions in specifications
  5. Formalities pertaining to amendments
  6. International applications designating India
  7. Examination of applications
  8. Expedited examination of applications
  9. Hearings – timeframes and remote participations
  10. Oppositions
  11. Adjournment of hearings
  12. Certified copies
  13. Agency
  14. Power to extend time prescribed
  15. Fees for sequence listing

The firm’s engagement as a stakeholder in the patents process also sees some of its proposals being incorporated in the Rules:

  • Refund of examination fees
  • Permission to delete claims when entering national phase in India
  • 6+3 months’ time to reply to the examination report

Authored by Nupur Maithani.

This article was published on Patents Rewind.

Most Recent

News & Insights

VIEW ALL
News & Updates, Thought Leadership
Aug 01, 2026

On 24 May 2024, after roughly a quarter-century of negotiation, the Member States of the World Intellectual Property Organisation adopted, by consensus

WIPO GRATK Treaty: India Helped Write and Would Not Sign
News & Updates, Thought Leadership
Jul 17, 2026

First published by Lexology. Authors: Sandhya Singh and Sampada Kapoor Modern sport is no longer merely an athletic competition; it is a multi-billion-dollar

Managing Ambush Marketing: Legal and Commercial Perspectives
News & Updates, Thought Leadership
Jul 16, 2026

First published by IP Stars. Authors: Safir Anand and Sehr Anand In a digital landscape where the internet never forgets, an individual’s past can

The Right Not to Be Published: Inside the Delhi High Court’s Landmark ‘Right to Be Forgotten’ Judgment
News & Updates, Thought Leadership
Jul 14, 2026

First published by Lexology. Authors: Lakshmidevi Somanath and Kanishka Vaish I. The Quiet Trend of Strong Evidence Engineering Anyone who has appeared

Evidence Engineering in IP Litigation