Skip to main content

Pioneer Overseas Corp, a DuPont group company, accused Hyderabad-based plant breeder Kaveri Seeds of copying the gene structure of a variety of corn developed by the US-based firm.

Under the Protection of Plant Variety and Farmers Right Act, 2001, a provision allowed the Registrar of Plant Varieties to pass interim orders (such as an injunction) against breeders of seeds and plant varieties, till the time an application attained registration. In addition to being constitutionally unsound, this provision also gave such powers to the Registrar, which was not conferred upon any other Registrar under other IP legislations.

In a writ petition filed by certain seed companies in India, the Delhi High Court had ruled that the provision was arbitrary, constitutionally unsound and that the Registrar was granted unreasonably wide powers.

In a bold move, Pioneer Overseas Corporation (one of the interveners in the writ petition before the Delhi High Court), through Anand and Anand approached the Supreme Court of India and challenged the order passed by the Delhi High Court. Although interim orders in matters challenging the final orders passed by the writ court at a preliminary stage in the appeal is a rather rare feat, Pioneer was successful in obtaining a stay of the order which rendered the above-mentioned provision as constitutionally invalid.

The victory marks a monumental feat in the regime governing plant varieties in India.

The matter was recognized by IBLJ Deals of the Year 2017.

Most Recent

News & Insights

VIEW ALL
News & Updates, Thought Leadership
Jun 16, 2026

First published by Lexology. Authors: Pravin Anand and Dr. Neeti Wilson Introduction India’s biodiversity is one of its greatest strategic assets.

India’s Biodiversity Framework at a Crossroads: Industry Perspectives on the Biological Diversity Act and ABS Regulations, 2025
News & Updates, Thought Leadership
Jun 16, 2026

First published by Lexology. Authors: Sandhya Singh and Sampada Kapoor Introduction In today’s marketplace, consumers often identify products not

Protecting Colour as a Brand Asset: Lessons from the Exide-Amara Raja Decision
News & Updates, Thought Leadership
Jun 11, 2026

‘First published on Legal500’ By: Lakshmidevi Somanath The Supreme Court of India’s 2025 decision in K. Mangayarkarasi and Anr v. N. J. Sundaresan marks

Arbitrating Trademark Disputes Following Mangayarkarasi – The Extent of Contractual Reach into Public Law
Thought Leadership
May 30, 2026

‘First published on Enterprise IT World’ Author: Subroto Kumar Panda The defining question for every board of directors has changed. It is no longer,

From Blueprint to Battle-Ready: The CIO’s Executive Guide to Cyber Resilience