Skip to main content

What is common between Apple, Pfizer and Michael Jordan? All three are famous brands. All three have a distinct fan following and consumer base. All three have lost trademark battles in China.

Recently in May 2016, Apple lost the right over its famous trademark ‘iPhone’ in China to a Chinese leather goods manufacturer as it failed to prove that ‘iPhone’ had gained popularity or had become famous for its goods before the Chinese maker obtained registration for the trademark IPHONE in China.

In 2015, Michael Jordan lost rights over the mandarin transliteration of his name i.e. Qiaodan to a Chinese imitator.  The court held that ““Qiaodan” is not the only name that corresponds to “Jordan,” and “Jordan” is only an ordinary surname of American people, not a full name. The court concluded that the evidence presented before it was not enough to prove that the term/name “Qiaodan” determinedly pointed to Michael Jordan…” Jordan has appealed this decision before the Supreme Court of China and the final decision is awaited.

Authored by Astha Negi.

Read more

Most Recent

News & Insights

VIEW ALL
News & Updates, Thought Leadership
Jan 15, 2026

First published by Lexology. Authors: Safir Anand, Mudit Kaushik and Sehr Anand The handling of price sensitive corporate information has become increasingly

The Regulatory Cost of Informal Digital Disclosures
News & Updates
Jan 02, 2026

First published by Lexology. Authors: Pravin Anand, Saif Khan, Shobhit Agarwal and Prajjwal Kushwaha A. Background B. Legal Issues Addressed C. Directions

LANDMARK RULING ON DOMAIN NAME FRAUD AND SYSTEMIC REFORMS IN DIGITAL COMMERCE
Thought Leadership
Jan 01, 2026

First published on Enterprise IT World. Authored by Subroto Kumar Panda As we stand on the final day of 2025, reflecting on a year of dizzying

The Great Dissolve: Re-Engineering Enterprise Workflows for the 2026 AI Paradigm
Thought Leadership
Dec 19, 2025

First published on Express Computer. Authored by Subroto Kumar Panda The notification of the Digital Personal Data Protection (DPDP) Rules, 2025, marks

The DPDP: An 18-month compliance imperative for the C-suite