Skip to main content

Trademark “VOLVO” protected in two simultaneous suits before the Delhi High Court

In two concurrent suits filed before the Hon’ble High Court of Delhi, ad interim ex-parte orders restraining the Defendants from making use of the Plaintiff’s trademark “Volvo” as a part of their domain name, e-mail ID, trading name or any other manner were passed. The Court also directed the Registrar of Domain names to suspend the operation of the respective domain names (which made use of the mark “VOLVO”) upon receiving communication from the Plaintiff.

1. AB Volvo vs Avantika Holidays

Vide order dated May 31, 2019, the Court passed an ad-interim ex-parte order restraining the Defendants from infringing the Plaintiffs’ trademark VOLVO as a part of the domain name (www.himachalvolvobus.com), e-mail ID (booking@himachalvolvobus.com) and any other manner whatsoever. Additionally, the Court directed the Defendants to produce documentary proof (if any) to ascertain if the use of the mark VOLVO by the Defendants is legitimate.

In addition to the above, the Court also directed the Registrar of Domain Names for the domain name (www.himachalvolvobus.com) to suspend the operation of the domain name upon receiving communication from the Plaintiff.

2. AB Volvo vs Gagan Kumar

Vide order dated May 31, 2019, the Court passed an ad-interim ex-parte order restraining the Defendants from infringing the Plaintiffs’ trademark “DAILY VOLVO BUS SERVICE”, “VOLVO BUS YATRA”, as a part of the domain name volvobusyatra.com and e-mail IDs info@volvobusyatra.com and volvobusyatra560@gmail.com or any other manner similar to the Plaintiff’s trademark VOLVO as a part of their trading name, in relation to buses, tourism-related services or any other services. Additionally, the Court directed the Defendants to produce documentary proof (if any) to ascertain if the use of the mark VOLVO by the Defendants is legitimate.

In addition to the above, the Court also directed the Registrar of Domain Names for the domain name (volvobusyatra.com) to suspend the operation of the domain name upon receiving communication from the Plaintiff.

Team Anand and Anand: Vaishali Mittal, Siddhant Chamola, Vrinda Gambhir and Ankita Sabharwal.

Most Recent

News & Insights

VIEW ALL
News & Updates, Thought Leadership
•
Oct 27, 2026

When a pharmaceutical company develops a new formulation of an existing drug, is it creating a genuine innovation or extending its monopoly over a medicine

Evergreening or Genuine Innovation? The Patentability of New Drug Formulations in India
News & Updates, Thought Leadership
•
Oct 23, 2026

Imagine a researcher using artificial intelligence to identify a new material, a pharmaceutical team using machine learning to discover a promising compound,

Can AI-Assisted Inventions Be Patented in India?
News & Updates, Thought Leadership
•
Oct 20, 2026

Every time someone publishes an article, uploads a photograph, releases a song or shares research online, they contribute to an expanding body of human

Who Owns Internet’s Knowledge? Copyright, AI Training and Indian Law
News & Updates, Thought Leadership
•
Oct 17, 2026

An active pharmaceutical ingredient (API) is the substance responsible for a medicine’s therapeutic effect. Developing one can involve years of chemical

API Process Patents in India: Key Patent Infringement Disputes and Court Decisions