Skip to main content

WIPO Administrative Panel orders Korean national to transfer the domain biotiquekorea.com to Bio Veda Action Research, owner of popular Indian cosmetics brand BIOTIQUE.

Bio Veda, owner of the registered trade mark BIOTIQUE, filed a complaint under the Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy before the World Intellectual Property Organization against a Korean national (respondent) for having parked the domain name biotiquekorea.com.

It contended that the domain name was confusingly similar to the mark BIOTIQUE; the respondent lacked legitimate interest or rights therein and that the domain name was registered in bad faith.

The Administrative Panel noted that the BIOTIQUE mark was registered in favour of Bio Veda in several countries and it had a significant online presence on major e-commerce websites, including those in Korea. Given that the disputed domain name merely adds a geographic location  to the mark BIOTIQUE, it is not likely that the respondent came up with the disputed domain name independently without the trademark BIOTIQUE in mind.

The Panel concluded that mere addition of a geographic term to the mark demonstrated the respondent’s knowledge of the similarity between the registered mark and disputed domain. That it was holding the domain name passively and not carrying on any commercial activity from it, assisted in a finding of bad faith in the facts.

Bio Veda Action Research Private Limited (India), and H.W. Cheong (Republic of Korea); before the Administrative Panel, WIPO; order dated 17 April 2017

Most Recent

News & Insights

VIEW ALL
News & Updates, Thought Leadership
Jun 16, 2026

First published by Lexology. Authors: Pravin Anand and Dr. Neeti Wilson Introduction India’s biodiversity is one of its greatest strategic assets.

India’s Biodiversity Framework at a Crossroads: Industry Perspectives on the Biological Diversity Act and ABS Regulations, 2025
News & Updates, Thought Leadership
Jun 16, 2026

First published by Lexology. Authors: Sandhya Singh and Sampada Kapoor Introduction In today’s marketplace, consumers often identify products not

Protecting Colour as a Brand Asset: Lessons from the Exide-Amara Raja Decision
News & Updates, Thought Leadership
Jun 11, 2026

‘First published on Legal500’ By: Lakshmidevi Somanath The Supreme Court of India’s 2025 decision in K. Mangayarkarasi and Anr v. N. J. Sundaresan marks

Arbitrating Trademark Disputes Following Mangayarkarasi – The Extent of Contractual Reach into Public Law
Thought Leadership
May 30, 2026

‘First published on Enterprise IT World’ Author: Subroto Kumar Panda The defining question for every board of directors has changed. It is no longer,

From Blueprint to Battle-Ready: The CIO’s Executive Guide to Cyber Resilience