Skip to main content

An article exploring the evolution of competition legislation in India, the role of competition authorities and the relationship between competition law and intellectual property.

Competition law in India was governed from 1969 to 2002/2003 by the Monopolies and Restrictive Trade Practices Act 1979 (MRTP Act). This Act essentially regulated three types of practices: monopolistic practices, restrictive trade practices and unfair trade practices. The Parliament in its wisdom thought it fit to repeal this law and replaced it with the Competition Act 2002 which has brought about some fundamental changes:

  • Monopolistic practices were replaced with “abuse of dominance”, and per se dominance was no longer culpable;
  • Unfair trade practices were shifted out of the competition legislation and added to the Consumer Protection Act 1986; and
  • The Competition Commission of India (CCI) was set up as a watchdog for competition.

Over 500 cases have come before the CCI and the appellate body, the Competition Appellate Tribunal (COMPAT). The most recent decisions of the CCI and the COMPAT can be roughly classified into: cases relating to unilateral conduct; relating to concerted action; and, those leading to questions regarding powers of the CCI and the ambit of competition law.

Authored by Abhilasha Nautiyal and Udayan Jain.

This article was published in Australian Journal of Competition and Consumer Law December 2014.

To continue reading, please contact us at email@anandandanand.com

Most Recent

News & Insights

VIEW ALL
Thought Leadership
Dec 19, 2025

First published on Express Computer. Authored by Subroto Kumar Panda The notification of the Digital Personal Data Protection (DPDP) Rules, 2025, marks

The DPDP: An 18-month compliance imperative for the C-suite
News & Updates, Thought Leadership
Dec 16, 2025

‘First published on India Business Law Journal’ By: Pravin Anand and Dr. Ajai Garg Artificial Intelligence (AI) is fuelling one of the most significant

Law can keep us safe from superintelligence
News & Updates
Dec 05, 2025

The High Court of Delhi in a significant interim ruling, “AB SKF vs M/S PARAMOUNT BEARING CO. & ORS.”, CS(COMM) 963/2025, dated 19/11/2025 has clarified

Distinction Between Order 38, Rule 5 and Order 39, Rules 1-2 CPC in the Context of “Maintenance of Status Quo”
News & Updates
Nov 26, 2025

Authored by Pravin Anand There are areas of intellectual property law where one can sense, quite literally, the convergence of disciplines that do not

When Art Meets Science in Trademark Law: Reflections on India’s First Smell Mark