Skip to main content

Favourable order in just two hearings, costs paid along with an undertaking for withdrawal of trademark application

In one of our recent litigations, we were successful in receiving a favourable order in just two hearings along with costs and an undertaking from the Defendant to withdraw its trademark application.

The Plaintiff, a German company Bals Elektrotechnik GmbH & Co. KG manufactures industrial electrical equipment under its trademark BALS. The Plaintiff found out that Sawan Electric Company was selling industrial plugs and sockets under an infringing mark I-BALS. On further enquiry and investigation, it was found that the Defendants had also filed an application before the Trademark Registry for registration of its mark I-BALS.

It was also found that the Defendants had supplied their infringing products to L&T, which were then used for electrical installations at the IGI Airport, New Delhi, which was a serious concern for the Plaintiff.

The Plaintiff, through Anand and Anand, took swift action against the Defendants, before the Delhi High Court, and the matter was decreed in favour of the Plaintiff in just two hearings.

  • On the first date, an interim injunction was granted against the Defendants and they were retrained from using the I-BALS mark, and a Local Commissioner was appointed to conduct search and seizure at the Defendants’ premises. The Local Commissioner seized more than 1,600 products from the Defendants, after which the Defendants approached the Plaintiff for settlement.
  • On the second date before Court, the Defendants tendered an unconditional apology before the Court, for infringing the trademark of the Plaintiff, and undertook to withdraw its Trademark application filed before the Trademark Registry. The Defendants also paid Rs. 8,00,000/- as costs of litigation to the Plaintiff. The High Court accepted the apology and undertaking of the Defendants and passed a decree in favour of the Plaintiff.

Team Anand and Anand: Pravin Anand, Manish Biala, Devesh Ratan and Ashutosh Upadhyaya.

 

Most Recent

News & Insights

VIEW ALL
News & Updates
Dec 05, 2025

The High Court of Delhi in a significant interim ruling, “AB SKF vs M/S PARAMOUNT BEARING CO. & ORS.”, CS(COMM) 963/2025, dated 19/11/2025 has clarified

Distinction Between Order 38, Rule 5 and Order 39, Rules 1-2 CPC in the Context of “Maintenance of Status Quo”
News & Updates
Nov 26, 2025

Authored by Pravin Anand There are areas of intellectual property law where one can sense, quite literally, the convergence of disciplines that do not

When Art Meets Science in Trademark Law: Reflections on India’s First Smell Mark
Thought Leadership
Nov 25, 2025

First published on Lexology. Authored by Vaishali R Mittal In a landmark moment for Indian intellectual property law, the Trademarks Registry has accepted

Scenting the Future: How India’s First Smell Mark Application Aligns with Global Jurisprudence
Thought Leadership
Nov 21, 2025

We are proud to share that the Trade Marks Registry of India has, for the first time, accepted an olfactory (smell) mark for advertisement — “Floral

A Landmark First for Indian Trademark Law