Skip to main content

Abhilasha Nautiyal and Shrawan Chopra cull out the salience of the Delhi High Court decision holding the marks ‘Officer’s Special’ and ‘Collector’s Choice’ as likely to be confused with Allied Blenders and Distiller’s mark ‘Officer’s Choice’ for whisky.

  1. Principles for determining likelihood of confusion between competing trademarks
  2. Likelihood of confusion when marks have the same or similar meaning
  3. Storage and retrieval of ideas from memory
  4. Impact of different trade dress when the marks are semantically similar
  5. Principles of copyright

Continue reading for a detailed analysis.

This article was published on Legal 500.

Most Recent

News & Insights

VIEW ALL
Thought Leadership
May 29, 2025

‘First published on Lexology’ By: Sandhya Singh, Sampada Kapoor and Kritika Gandhi Trademarks play a pivotal role in distinguishing the goods or services

Heir of the Family Trademarks
Thought Leadership
May 15, 2025

‘First published on India Business Law Journal’ By: Pravin Anand, Dr. Ajai Garg and Alvin Antony The ascendancy of large language models (LLMs) has

Navigating the AI frontier: India’s sovereign LLM quest
Thought Leadership
Apr 30, 2025

‘First published on Asia IP’ By: Prachi Agarwal and Manan Mondal In a significant ruling, the Division Bench of the Delhi High Court in Wipro Enterprises

Senior user versus junior user: Delhi High Court confirms passing off in a trademark dispute
Thought Leadership
Apr 29, 2025

‘First published on IP Stars’ By: Safir Anand, Omesh Puri and Abhishek Paliwal As the world changes and technology grows fast, the way we think about

The future of trademarks: shaping tomorrow’s brand identity