Skip to main content

Involve Police and IT Officers Fully to get to bottom of Typo-squatting Cases says High Court

Delhi High Court passes interim injunction against defendants in case involving use of a deceptive domain to defraud genuine customers. Bank ordered to suspend and freeze all transactions of account used to receive proceeds illicitly.

Autodesk Inc is a world-renowned software and digital company with a presence in over 150 countries. It is the registered proprietor of the AUTODESK trademark in India and maintains its website at ‘www.autodesk.com’ and uses ‘@autodesk.com’ to communicate with its customers.

The defendant along with other unknown defendants (John Does) deliberately adopted and registered ‘www.auotdesk.com’, a typographical variation of Autodesk’s domain. They then proceeded to send phishing emails to Autodesk’s bona fide customers.

Autodesk approached the court when it learnt that one of its customers had become a victim of fraud, having made payment against an invoice sent by the defendant which contained the bank account details of the defendant. The fraudulent invoices had been physically delivered to customers by the defendant.

The court concluded that a prima facie case of infringement and passing-off had been made out. It granted an ad interim injunction restraining the use and operation of the impugned domain name www.auotdesk.com, including its use as an email address.

The bank in which the defendant’s account was used to receive the proceeds of crime was joined as a defendant in the matter too. This enabled the court to pass a Mareva injunction, ordering a freezing of the bank account.

Typo-squatting cases involving misappropriation of well-recognized domain names are relatively nascent, but significantly on the rise in India.

Cognisant thereof, the court was strongly of the view that in matters such as these, it is necessary to involve the police and the authorized officer under the Information Technology Act 2000 in order to fully investigate and catch the perpetrators.

A subsequent complaint before the Principal Secretary (IT) Government of Delhi, who is the authorised officer under the Information Technology Act 2000 has been preferred by Autodesk and the same is pending consideration.

Autodesk Inc. v Ms. Priya Das & ors; before the Delhi High Court; order dated 10.10.2017

Most Recent

News & Insights

VIEW ALL
News & Updates, Thought Leadership
Jun 16, 2026

First published by Lexology. Authors: Pravin Anand and Dr. Neeti Wilson Introduction India’s biodiversity is one of its greatest strategic assets.

India’s Biodiversity Framework at a Crossroads: Industry Perspectives on the Biological Diversity Act and ABS Regulations, 2025
News & Updates, Thought Leadership
Jun 16, 2026

First published by Lexology. Authors: Sandhya Singh and Sampada Kapoor Introduction In today’s marketplace, consumers often identify products not

Protecting Colour as a Brand Asset: Lessons from the Exide-Amara Raja Decision
News & Updates, Thought Leadership
Jun 11, 2026

‘First published on Legal500’ By: Lakshmidevi Somanath The Supreme Court of India’s 2025 decision in K. Mangayarkarasi and Anr v. N. J. Sundaresan marks

Arbitrating Trademark Disputes Following Mangayarkarasi – The Extent of Contractual Reach into Public Law
Thought Leadership
May 30, 2026

‘First published on Enterprise IT World’ Author: Subroto Kumar Panda The defining question for every board of directors has changed. It is no longer,

From Blueprint to Battle-Ready: The CIO’s Executive Guide to Cyber Resilience