Skip to main content

This suit was filed by Hyundai against car companies Mahindra and Renault who had collaborated to form a joint venture in India to launch a hatchback car under the brand SANDERO.

Owing to the similarity between the impugned mark SANDERO and Hyundai’s own famous hatchback SANTRO, Hyundai proceeded to file the suit in 2009 on a quia timet cause of action since the SANDERO car was not yet commercially available in the Indian market.

After Hyundai had led evidence in the suit, the Defendants informed the court that Mahindra and Renault’s joint venture in India had come to an end and they had withdrawn their application seeking registration of the SANDERO mark in India. They did not intend to launch the SANDERO car in India, at the time. However the Defendants were not willing to undertake that they would not launch the SANDERO car in India in future and the matter was kept pending.

The counsel for the parties continued to explore ways for their clients to arrive at a mutual settlement, even at the stage of final hearing, and eventually agreed that:

A The Defendants will tender an undertaking to Court that they will not launch the SANDERO car in India for at least the next 3 years.

B The Plaintiff will withdraw the suit on the basis of this undertaking with liberty to file a fresh suit should any cause of action arise against the Defendants in future.

C The Plaintiff will also be permitted to rely on the evidence led in the present suit in any future proceedings.

The Court accepted the terms of settlement proposed by the parties and recorded the Defendants undertaking. The Plaintiff was permitted to withdraw the suit with liberty to file afresh and rely on the evidence led, in future proceedings.

Hyundai Motor India Ltd. v Mahindra Renault Pvt. Ltd.; before Delhi High Court; order dated 12.10.2017

Most Recent

News & Insights

VIEW ALL
News & Updates
Nov 04, 2025

In a remarkable conclusion to one of India’s longest-running trademark disputes, the order authored by Justice Sanjeev Narula of the Hon’ble High Court

DELHI HIGH COURT BRINGS 25-YEAR “CELEBRATIONS” TRADEMARK DISPUTE TO A WHOLESOME CLOSE
News & Updates
Nov 02, 2025

Partner Litigation, Dhruv Anand, spoke to Times of India for its dive-deep article on ‘Stars v AI’ giving a 360 degree roundup of what actually makes

Stars vs AI: Dhruv Anand speaks to ToI about personality rights and the intent behind protecting them
Thought Leadership
Oct 22, 2025

‘First published on Lexology’ By: Pravin Anand, Vaishali R Mittal and Siddhant Chamola A. INTRODUCTION Standards‑essential patents (“SEPs”)

Interim Licences vs Anti Interim Injunctions: a Cross Border Stand Off
Thought Leadership
Oct 16, 2025

‘First published on Lexology’ By: Safir Anand and Omesh Puri The Office of the Controller General of Patents, Designs, and Trade Marks has issued a

Indian Trade Marks Office issues Office Order – Streamlining Registry Function