Skip to main content

Delhi High Court grants permanent injunction and costs against defendants using well-known YAHOO trademark as a trade name and infringing domain. “Enormous” potential for harm on the internet”, it notes.

Yahoo Inc., renowned for its pioneering internet-based services and platforms, initiated proceedings against the defendants before the Delhi High Court for infringement of its well-known YAHOO trademark and misuse of its brand upon learning of the defendants’ travel and tourism agency operated under the name YAHOOKOCHI.  The defendants maintained a website under the domain name www.yahookochi.com, and their premises and their business card displayed the unique and recognisable YAHOO logo, which had been used by Yahoo till 2014.

The court noted that the YAHOO trade mark has been declared well-known and is registered in the list of well-known trademarks maintained by the Trade Mark Registry. The services offered by the defendants were in Class 39 of the Nice Classification, the same for which Yahoo has registered YAHOO formative marks.

It concluded that that adoption of the YAHOO mark by the defendants was dishonest, made evident by the fact that the font used by the defendants to represent YAHOO in their trading name was identical to YAHOO’s unique stylised font. Moreover, the defendants had no justification for the adoption of the YAHOO mark.

Given the vast internet presence of Yahoo, and its diverse offerings, the court opined that “the potentiality of harm is enormous on the internet”. Compensatory damages of Rs.200,000 and punitive damages of Rs.300,000 were awarded in favour of Yahoo, as well as costs assessed at just under Rs.500,000.

Yahoo, Inc v Mr Rinshad Rinu & Ors; before Delhi High Court; judgment dated 3 July 2017

Read more about Yahoo’s Yodel, the first sound mark to be registered in India.

Most Recent

News & Insights

VIEW ALL
News & Updates, Thought Leadership
Jul 17, 2026

First published by Lexology. Authors: Sandhya Singh and Sampada Kapoor Modern sport is no longer merely an athletic competition; it is a multi-billion-dollar

Managing Ambush Marketing: Legal and Commercial Perspectives
News & Updates, Thought Leadership
Jul 16, 2026

First published by IP Stars. Authors: Safir Anand and Sehr Anand In a digital landscape where the internet never forgets, an individual’s past can

The Right Not to Be Published: Inside the Delhi High Court’s Landmark ‘Right to Be Forgotten’ Judgment
News & Updates, Thought Leadership
Jul 14, 2026

First published by Lexology. Authors: Lakshmidevi Somanath and Kanishka Vaish I. The Quiet Trend of Strong Evidence Engineering Anyone who has appeared

Evidence Engineering in IP Litigation
News & Updates, Thought Leadership
Jul 14, 2026

‘First published on Legal Era’ By: Safir Anand and Omesh Puri Understanding copyright ownership in Short-Form Videos For decades, businesses measured

Understanding copyright ownership in Short-Form Videos