Skip to main content

All News & Insights by damages tag


Showing 1-9 of 11
News & Updates
September 9, 2019

Amicable resolution qua settlements – a catena of our recent settlement cases

Amicable resolution of a dispute through settlement is an efficient and resourceful way to end a dispute. Parties mutually agree on the terms and conditions

News & Updates
August 13, 2019

Yet another Injunction against Infringement of the Well-known Trademark “TATA”

Tata Sons Ltd. vs. Sandeep Arora CS (Comm) No. 222 of 2018 The suit was filed seeking an order of permanent injunction restraining infringement of trademark,

News & Updates
July 17, 2019

Yet another judicial direction aimed at supporting the needy

TATA SONS LTD. VS. PRAKASH YADAV & ORS. CS (COMM) NO. 383 OF 2018 This civil suit was filed against the Defendants before the Delhi High Court as they

News & Updates
July 11, 2019

Injunction granted in favour of a large dairy concern

Mother Dairy Fruit and Vegetable Pvt Ltd vs. Kumar Prahlad and Another, CS(COMM) 297/2019 Plaintiff filed the suit for permanent and mandatory injunction,

News & Updates
May 2, 2019

Landmark decision on the question of damages involving Philips

“A highest ever quantum of damages has been awarded in a copyright & design infringement case in one of our landmark judgments. The matters dealt with

News & Updates
March 7, 2019

Super Cassettes Industries Ltd v. M/S Shreya Broadcasting Pvt Ltd, CS (OS) 1372/2009

Super Cassettes is engaged in the business of manufacturing and marketing audio cassettes, video cassettes, compact discs (CDs), etc. and has a vast repertoire

News & Updates
September 14, 2018

Delhi High Court passes an Injunction order in favor of Tata Sons – Domain Name transferred; Damages and Cost granted

India’s leading corporate house, Tata Sons Pvt Ltd and its group company, Tata Capital Limited, filed a suit against Krishna Kumar (Defendant No 1),

News & Updates
August 7, 2018

Tata Sons Limited & Anr v. Krishna Kumar & Ors.; CS (COMM) NO.225 OF 2018

The Defendants, in this case, were portraying to unwary customers that they are a prominent TATA Group Company and are engaged in the business of providing

News & Updates
July 17, 2018

Suit filed against the defendants for use of ‘OBEROI’ in conjunction with Trademark “Three Sixty” and “Three sixty one”

The suit was filed for infringement of trademark, passing off, dilution and damages, etc. against defendants’ use of the mark ‘THREE SIXTY WEST’

Showing 1-9 of 11