Skip to main content

This suit was filed by Hyundai against car companies Mahindra and Renault who had collaborated to form a joint venture in India to launch a hatchback car under the brand SANDERO.

Owing to the similarity between the impugned mark SANDERO and Hyundai’s own famous hatchback SANTRO, Hyundai proceeded to file the suit in 2009 on a quia timet cause of action since the SANDERO car was not yet commercially available in the Indian market.

After Hyundai had led evidence in the suit, the Defendants informed the court that Mahindra and Renault’s joint venture in India had come to an end and they had withdrawn their application seeking registration of the SANDERO mark in India. They did not intend to launch the SANDERO car in India, at the time. However the Defendants were not willing to undertake that they would not launch the SANDERO car in India in future and the matter was kept pending.

The counsel for the parties continued to explore ways for their clients to arrive at a mutual settlement, even at the stage of final hearing, and eventually agreed that:

A The Defendants will tender an undertaking to Court that they will not launch the SANDERO car in India for at least the next 3 years.

B The Plaintiff will withdraw the suit on the basis of this undertaking with liberty to file a fresh suit should any cause of action arise against the Defendants in future.

C The Plaintiff will also be permitted to rely on the evidence led in the present suit in any future proceedings.

The Court accepted the terms of settlement proposed by the parties and recorded the Defendants undertaking. The Plaintiff was permitted to withdraw the suit with liberty to file afresh and rely on the evidence led, in future proceedings.

Hyundai Motor India Ltd. v Mahindra Renault Pvt. Ltd.; before Delhi High Court; order dated 12.10.2017

Most Recent

News & Insights

VIEW ALL
News & Updates, Thought Leadership
Aug 01, 2026

On 24 May 2024, after roughly a quarter-century of negotiation, the Member States of the World Intellectual Property Organisation adopted, by consensus

WIPO GRATK Treaty: India Helped Write and Would Not Sign
News & Updates, Thought Leadership
Jul 17, 2026

First published by Lexology. Authors: Sandhya Singh and Sampada Kapoor Modern sport is no longer merely an athletic competition; it is a multi-billion-dollar

Managing Ambush Marketing: Legal and Commercial Perspectives
News & Updates, Thought Leadership
Jul 16, 2026

First published by IP Stars. Authors: Safir Anand and Sehr Anand In a digital landscape where the internet never forgets, an individual’s past can

The Right Not to Be Published: Inside the Delhi High Court’s Landmark ‘Right to Be Forgotten’ Judgment
News & Updates, Thought Leadership
Jul 14, 2026

First published by Lexology. Authors: Lakshmidevi Somanath and Kanishka Vaish I. The Quiet Trend of Strong Evidence Engineering Anyone who has appeared

Evidence Engineering in IP Litigation