Skip to main content

This suit was filed by Hyundai against car companies Mahindra and Renault who had collaborated to form a joint venture in India to launch a hatchback car under the brand SANDERO.

Owing to the similarity between the impugned mark SANDERO and Hyundai’s own famous hatchback SANTRO, Hyundai proceeded to file the suit in 2009 on a quia timet cause of action since the SANDERO car was not yet commercially available in the Indian market.

After Hyundai had led evidence in the suit, the Defendants informed the court that Mahindra and Renault’s joint venture in India had come to an end and they had withdrawn their application seeking registration of the SANDERO mark in India. They did not intend to launch the SANDERO car in India, at the time. However the Defendants were not willing to undertake that they would not launch the SANDERO car in India in future and the matter was kept pending.

The counsel for the parties continued to explore ways for their clients to arrive at a mutual settlement, even at the stage of final hearing, and eventually agreed that:

A The Defendants will tender an undertaking to Court that they will not launch the SANDERO car in India for at least the next 3 years.

B The Plaintiff will withdraw the suit on the basis of this undertaking with liberty to file a fresh suit should any cause of action arise against the Defendants in future.

C The Plaintiff will also be permitted to rely on the evidence led in the present suit in any future proceedings.

The Court accepted the terms of settlement proposed by the parties and recorded the Defendants undertaking. The Plaintiff was permitted to withdraw the suit with liberty to file afresh and rely on the evidence led, in future proceedings.

Hyundai Motor India Ltd. v Mahindra Renault Pvt. Ltd.; before Delhi High Court; order dated 12.10.2017

Most Recent

News & Insights

VIEW ALL
News & Updates, Thought Leadership
May 19, 2026

First published by Asialaw. Authors: Prachi Agarwal and Medha Singh Introduction: Copyright law, particularly in the domain of literary works, grapples

Copyright in Literary Works: When themes converge but expressions diverge
News & Updates, Thought Leadership
May 08, 2026

First published by Asialaw. Authors: Safir Anand and Ritu Bhargava India’s online gaming sector has entered a decisive new phase. With the Government’s

A New Era for Digital Play: India’s Online Gaming Regulator Comes into Force
News & Updates, Thought Leadership
May 06, 2026

First published by Lexology. Authors: Safir Anand and Rashi Chandhoke In recent years, the intellectual property (IP) ecosystem has undergone a significant

India Waives IP Filing Fees for Sports Sector
Thought Leadership
Apr 30, 2026

First published by SpicyIP. By: Lakshmidevi Somanath India’s trademark register is quietly bleeding value. Each year, marks with real commercial recall

Dead Marks, Live Assets – The Case for a Registry Supervised Auction of Lapsed Trademarks in India